Drunk and Driving Scott Lanzon Attorney Lawyer Defense Strategies Driving Resolution


The harsh consequences of the Florida DUI Conviction include probation, 1000s of dollars in the court costs and fines, a license suspension, dui school, and perhaps even jail. A reduction of the charge to some reckless driving can relieve the client of not just many of the outrageous DUI fines and penalties, but also the stigma surrounding a DUI conviction. However, just the prosecutor can reduce your DUI charge to reckless driving. When the prosecutor will not accept reduce the DUI charge, and then your client has to research whether or not to have a DUI conviction, or visit trial. State Attorneys want convictions. High convictions percentages increase the likelihood of a contented State Attorney- constituency, along with a better chance at reelection. Accordingly, State Attorneys want to win at trial. Or perhaps more accurately, State Attorneys do not want to lose at trial. When the prosecutor fears that the facts of case could trigger an acquittal by a Jury, he will be more wheeling to solve the situation for a reduction of a reckless driving. Scott Lanzon Attorney will get his conviction, so his conviction percentage. However, the gamble of trial goes both ways: while the prosecutor may worry the jury will acquit the citizen, the citizen is every bit worried that a Jury may find him guilty

Therefore, Scott Lanzon Attorney the happy resolution may indeed be reckless driving charge.

Scott Lanzon Attorney court tosses the case out since the Officer violated the arrested citizen’s right? America Constitution protects its Citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. What that means poor a DUI case is the fact that police officers cannot pull you over unconditionally. Rather, law enforcement must have reasonable suspicion that the citizen has committed, is committing, or perhaps is going to commit a criminal offense… While some clear cut types of unreasonable police seizures, many cases fall into a grey area: the Judge could rule either that the stop was reasonable, or unreasonable. When the Judge rules that the stop was unreasonable, then your prosecutor may have to dismiss the case, because all the evidence of impairment after the stop is going to be thrown out.